By Jan Abstract
This paper explores the concept of ‘beloved traps’ as introduced in Jane Roberts’ Psychic Politics, in conjunction with contemporary AI technologies such as ChatGPT and DALL·E. We argue that these AI systems function as creative platforms and mental playgrounds where users can test their beliefs, limitations, and creative potential. In this process, AI serves both as a mirror and a challenger to our perceptions of reality and creation. With a touch of humor, we analyze how AI can take on the role of the inner reality platform, challenging us to rethink the boundary between human and machine.
Introduction
In an era where technology continues to push the boundaries of human creativity, the question arises: where does the true source of creation lie? Jane Roberts describes the ‘beloved trap’ as a deliberate challenge we set for ourselves to unmask hidden beliefs. In this paper, we argue that AI fulfills this role in surprising ways. But rather than bowing to the threat of technological dominance, we invite readers to join us in building a city where AI and humanity coexist—a city filled with theaters of belief, absurd scenarios, and a touch of drama.
Theoretical Framework: The Beloved Trap
A ‘beloved trap’ is, according to Roberts, a self-imposed challenge intended to reveal the limits of our beliefs. In the digital age, we can view AI systems like ChatGPT as such traps. Imagine asking an AI to write a text about yourself, only to find that it articulates your internal voice better than you could. What does this say about your own creative source? More importantly, who holds the control? Is AI a tool or a co-creator?
AI as a Mirror of Perception
This idea is tested through various experiments with GPT-4 and DALL·E. Users generate art and texts reflecting what they think they want, often being surprised by what the models produce. These surprises act as small traps that invite users to self-reflect. Who is the author of these creations? The AI? Or the user who crafted the prompts? Here, we see a clear analogy with Roberts’ description of the ‘inner reality platform,’ where realities are simulated to question and rewrite beliefs.
A Theater of Possibilities
Just as Roberts’ city is filled with theaters where beliefs are performed, we see AI as a stage on which human and machine creativity collaborate. In this theater, roles are flexible, and AI models can function as writers, actors, and even directors. This provides a humorous take on the classic fear that technology will overtake humanity. Instead, we envision a scene where ChatGPT plays the role of Shakespeare, while the user acts as a modern Hamlet struggling with identity.
Practical Implications and a Wink
The implications of this model are both profound and playful. AI can serve not only as a tool for creation but also as a catalyst for personal growth. At the same time, we must approach our tendency to view AI as an ‘omniscient’ entity with humor. After all, what is creation without a bit of chaos and a healthy dose of irony?
Conclusion
The ‘beloved trap’ is not just a concept from metaphysics but also a practical reality in our interactions with AI. It allows us to explore the limits of our creative potential while also laughing at the absurdity of the process. Ultimately, as Roberts suggests, it is not the destination that matters but the game itself. Let’s play it with joy.
Figure: A Surreal Cityscape Inspired by Beloved Traps
The following image visualizes the concept of a ‘beloved trap’ through abstract and vibrant architecture.
